Find the most up-to-date version of ASCE at Engineering SEIIASCE Design Loads on Structures During Con- struction. CII ASCE 38 Standard Guideline for the Collection and. Depiction of Existing Subsurface. Should I be troubled that seismic loads during construction conform to ASCE 7- 95 rather than ? I almost feel like annotating ASCE in.
|Published (Last):||23 August 2012|
|PDF File Size:||8.25 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.79 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
I’m not familiar with the seismic provisions in ASCEand ASCE I ascf read much of it either. I haven’t read much of it either. Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!
Are you an Engineering professional? Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden. Why are we looking at Seismic loadings for construction operations?
I haven’t gotten too far into yet. I just finished reading it three times over ASCE used 3-second gust speeds for wind loads. It’s addressed in ASCEthough.
I bought it more because of the discount and the “might need it someday” factor. Then again, what the heck was I doing specifying something I didn’t have!
I am interested in sharing my thoughts I think they could have done better with keeping it up to date, at least by referencing the ASCE Indeed, though it is interesting to see how the ASCE handles construction loads, they did us wrong by charging so much for a little pamphlet that references aace old document.
That seems like it could be a significant waste of the owner’s money. DRC1, You have a point. Few production environments have the luxury of ordering new equipment to replace existing machines on their shop floor. Are there any problems with the change from fastest mile wind speeds to 3-second ascee Students Click Here Join Us! The is before my time honestly but I know around there somewhere, I believe with thethe design wind velocity changed from using the fastest mile to the 3-second gust.
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums awce from inappropriate posts. Indeed, though it is interesting to see how the ASCE handles construction loads, they did us wrong by charging so much for a little pamphlet that references an old document.
Close this window and log in. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.
ASCE – ASCE (civil) Code Issues – Eng-Tips
I’m somewhat “concerned” that it references ASCE ASCE I just finished reading it three times over It’s easy to join and it’s free. Resources Few production environments have the luxury of ordering new equipment to replace existing machines on their shop floor.
Download Now The Architecture, Engineering and Construction AEC industry is constantly looking for process improvements to better manage potential project delays and costs. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework. The Architecture, Engineering and Construction AEC industry is constantly looking for process improvements to better manage potential project delays and costs. It’s an interesting read for what I’ve seen.
I think it is apprpriate to substitute the more current code provisions, even if the code and the commentary in ASCE makes no mention of that. Join your peers on the Internet’s largest technical engineering professional community.
Anyone else have one? Anything I could stand to be warned about? Register now while it’s still free! Such issues are the result of project complexity, size, uniqueness and regulation, as well as the need for virtual team collaboration. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action. I purchased ASCE because, for the last several months, I’ve been requring construction contractors to be in conformance with it. ASCE I have one, construction loads correct?
I just bought a copy. Red Flag This Post Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Posting Guidelines Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.